Abril v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission

208 So. 3d 310, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18682
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 21, 2016·No. No. 3D15-2160·Published

Opinion

LOGUE, J.

Ms. Abril appeals the denial of reemployment assistance benefits. Because the transcript comports with the referee’s findings of fact and legal conclusions, Abril cannot show reversible error. All of her arguments on appeal ask this court to reweight the evidence and the referee’s credibility determinations. An appellate court, however, is not entitled to reweigh such evidence. See, e.g., Contreras v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Com’n, 178 So.3d 953 (Fla. 4th DCA 2015) (noting that the appeals commission cannot reweigh the evidence and substitute its findings for those of the referee where the findings are supported by competent substantial evidence); Cesar v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Com’n, 121 So.3d 1181 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013) (reversing because the Commission improperly rejected the appeals referee’s findings where they were supported by competent substantial evidence).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abril v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission, 208 So. 3d 310, 2016 Fla. App. LEXIS 18682 (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

208 So. 3d 310 (Abril v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Angel Contreras v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission and Harold L. Simpson
178 So. 3d 953 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)
Cesar v. Reemployment Assistance Appeals Commission
121 So. 3d 1181 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)