Abreu v. Countrywide Bank, N.A.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 16, 2010
Docket09-2146
StatusUnpublished

This text of Abreu v. Countrywide Bank, N.A. (Abreu v. Countrywide Bank, N.A.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abreu v. Countrywide Bank, N.A., (4th Cir. 2010).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-2146

MARIA ABREU,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

COUNTRYWIDE BANK, N.A.; COUNTRYWIDE HOME LOANS; BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION; FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY; FEDERAL HOME LOANS MORTGAGE CORPORATION,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Greenbelt. Roger W. Titus, District Judge. (8:08- cv-02635-RWT)

Submitted: November 3, 2010 Decided: November 16, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Mary E. Goulet, WHITHAM, CURTIS, CHRISTOFFERSON & COOK, PC, Reston, Virginia, for Appellant. Charles S. Hirsch, Glenn A. Cline, BALLARD SPAHR, LLP, Baltimore, Maryland; Stephen E. Hart, FEDERAL HOUSING FINANCE AGENCY, Washington, D.C.; Howard N. Cayne, David B. Bergman, Ian S. Hoffman, Christopher A. Jaros, ARNOLD & PORTER, LLP, Washington, D.C., for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Maria Abreu appeals the district court’s order

granting summary judgment for the Defendants and its subsequent

order denying her motion to alter or amend the judgment. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm both the judgment of the district court

and its order denying Abreu’s post-judgment motion. Abreu v.

Countrywide Bank, N.A., No. 8:08-cv-02635-RWT (D. Md. July 24,

2009 & Sept. 3, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Abreu v. Countrywide Bank, N.A., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abreu-v-countrywide-bank-na-ca4-2010.