Abramson v. Urlacker

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abramson v. Urlacker

120 A.D.2d 982, 502 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57092

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 23, 1986

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 120 A.D.2d 982 (Abramson v. Urlacker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abramson v. Urlacker, 120 A.D.2d 982, 502 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57092 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, with costs. Memorandum: We find substantial evidence in the record to support respondent’s determination that petitioner was guilty of all three charges brought against him: sexual harassment of an 18-year-old female fare, failure to take the most direct route, and failure to keep an accurate manifest, all arising from one incident (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 182).

[983]*983Inasmuch as members of the public have a right to be free from sexual harassment when riding in taxicabs, we do not find the revocation of petitioner’s license and hack plate shocking to our sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 234). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.) Present — Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Schnepp, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Determination unanimously confirmed and petition dismissed, with costs. Memorandum: We find substantial evidence in the record to support respondent’s determination that petitioner was guilty of all three charges brought against him: sexual harassment of an 18-year-old female fare, failure to take the most direct route, and failure to keep an accurate manifest, all arising from one incident (see, 300 Gramatan Ave. Assoc. v State Div. of Human Rights, 45 NY2d 176, 182).

[983]*983Inasmuch as members of the public have a right to be free from sexual harassment when riding in taxicabs, we do not find the revocation of petitioner’s license and hack plate shocking to our sense of fairness (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ., 34 NY2d 222, 234). (Article 78 proceeding transferred by order of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Galloway, J.) Present — Denman, J. P., Green, Pine, Balio and Schnepp, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

120 A.D.2d 982, 502 N.Y.S.2d 869, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 57092, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abramson-v-urlacker-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack