Abramson v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Abramson v. State

5 So. 2d 603, 149 Fla. 307, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 768

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided January 16, 1942·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The only questions presented in this appeal are the sufficiency of the evidence and the prejudice to the case of the defendant in certain remarks made by the county solicitor. A careful examination of the evidence convinces us that there was ample testimony to support the verdict of guilty found by the jury and we are convinced, too, that the objectionable remarks *308 on the part of the prosecutor were properly stricken by the court, consequently, the judgment is—

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The only questions presented in this appeal are the sufficiency of the evidence and the prejudice to the case of the defendant in certain remarks made by the county solicitor. A careful examination of the evidence convinces us that there was ample testimony to support the verdict of guilty found by the jury and we are convinced, too, that the objectionable remarks *308 on the part of the prosecutor were properly stricken by the court, consequently, the judgment is—

Affirmed.

BROWN, C. J., TERRELL, CHAPMAN and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Abramson v. State, 5 So. 2d 603, 149 Fla. 307, 1942 Fla. LEXIS 768 (Fla. 1942).

Pincite

5 So. 2d 603 (Abramson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.