Abramson v. Mrs. J. Davis Gowns, Inc.

128 Misc. 454, 219 N.Y.S. 137, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 819
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York·Decided December 24, 1926·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The right to prove how much plaintiff, employee, had earned elsewhere during the term of his contract, after his dismissal from his position, is an essential and integral part of defendant’s case, and the erroneous denial of its motion for an examination before trial left it without any practical means of reducing the amount of damages claimed by plaintiff. (Handel v. Co-ed Dressmakers, Inc.., 216 App. Div. 838.)

Judgment and order reversed, with thirty dollars costs to appellant to abide the event, and motion granted. Examination to proceed at Part 1 of the Municipal Court, borough of Manhattan, Ninth District, on the 27th of December, 1926, at ten A. M.

All concur; present, Bijur, O’Malley and Levy, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abramson v. Mrs. J. Davis Gowns, Inc., 128 Misc. 454, 219 N.Y.S. 137, 1926 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

128 Misc. 454 (Abramson v. Mrs. J. Davis Gowns, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Clougherty v. Royal Insurance Company
232 A.2d 610 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1967)
Schwartz v. J. L. Taylor & Co.
225 A.D. 899 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1929)