Abrams v. State

736 So. 2d 1256, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9285, 1999 WL 492722
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 14, 1999·No. No. 98-1891·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s convictions for sale of cocaine and possession of cocaine with intent to sell. With respect to appellant’s second issue on appeal, see Tucker v. State, 559 So.2d 218 (Fla.1990)(a defendant may waive the right to a jury trial, provid[1257] ed that the waiver is reflected on the record).

AFFIRMED.

WARNER, C.J., SHAHOOD and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abrams v. State, 736 So. 2d 1256, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 9285, 1999 WL 492722 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

736 So. 2d 1256 (Abrams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tucker v. State
559 So. 2d 218 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1990)