Abrams v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Abrams v. State

124 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 600

CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

DecidedNovember 12, 1929

Docket2 Div. 433.

StatusPublished

This text of 124 So. 918 (Abrams v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abrams v. State, 124 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 600 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment preferred by the grand jury against this appellant contained two counts. The first charged that he did make, manufacture, or distill alcoholic or spirituous liquors, etc., and count 2 charged him with the possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose.

Upon arraignment of the defendant, he interposed a plea of guilty to the charge contained in the second count of the indictment. Judgment of conviction was accordingly pronounced and entered, from which appellant took an appeal, notwithstanding his plea of guilty. The appeal is manifestly for delay, as no point of decision is presented or apparent. Let the judgment stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The indictment preferred by the grand jury against this appellant contained two counts. The first charged that he did make, manufacture, or distill alcoholic or spirituous liquors, etc., and count 2 charged him with the possession of a still, etc., to be used for that purpose.

Upon arraignment of the defendant, he interposed a plea of guilty to the charge contained in the second count of the indictment. Judgment of conviction was accordingly pronounced and entered, from which appellant took an appeal, notwithstanding his plea of guilty. The appeal is manifestly for delay, as no point of decision is presented or apparent. Let the judgment stand affirmed.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

124 So. 918, 23 Ala. App. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrams-v-state-alactapp-1929.