Abrams v. State

84 So. 310, 17 Ala. App. 305
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Abrams v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 17 Ala. App. 379
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided December 16, 1919·No. 1 Div. 337.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The defendant was tried and convicted in the inferior criminal court of Mobile county of the offense of violating the prohibition law. He appealed to the circuit court and demanded a jury trial as provided by law. In the circuit court of Mobile county he was again convicted, from which judgment of the court this appeal is taken.

This appeal is on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. The trial judge certifies that the time for presenting a bill of exceptions has expired, and that no bill of exceptions Jias been presented. A careful examination of the record convinces us that the proceedings in the circuit court were in all things regular, and the record is free from error.

The judgment of the circuit court is therefore affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abrams v. State, 84 So. 310, 17 Ala. App. 305 (Ala. Ct. App. 1919).

84 So. 310 (Abrams v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.