Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp.

951 A.2d 255, 597 Pa. 219, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 884

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided June 10, 2008·No. Petition 45 EAL 2008, 46 EAL 2008·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issue, which has been rephrased for clarity:

(1) Does prior recovery of damages for increased risk and fear of developing cancer due to asbestos exposure, awarded under the one-disease rule, preclude a plaintiff from recovering damages for cancer that developed and was diagnosed after the separate disease rule was adopted in Marinari v. *220 Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., 417 Pa.Super. 440, 612 A.2d 1021 (1992) (en banc)?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 10th day of June, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED as to the following issue, which has been rephrased for clarity:

(1) Does prior recovery of damages for increased risk and fear of developing cancer due to asbestos exposure, awarded under the one-disease rule, preclude a plaintiff from recovering damages for cancer that developed and was diagnosed after the separate disease rule was adopted in Marinari v. *220 Asbestos Corporation, Ltd., 417 Pa.Super. 440, 612 A.2d 1021 (1992) (en banc)?

Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp., 951 A.2d 255, 597 Pa. 219, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 884 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

951 A.2d 255 (Abrams v. Pneumo Abex Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related