Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Abrams v. Planters Bank

Abrams v. Planters Bank

113 S.E. 20, 28 Ga. App. 638, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 744
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedJune 13, 1922
Docket13487
StatusPublished

This text of 113 S.E. 20 (Abrams v. Planters Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abrams v. Planters Bank, 113 S.E. 20, 28 Ga. App. 638, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 744 (Ga. Ct. App. 1922).

Opinion

Luke, J.

The petition for certiorari contained no legal reason why it should be sanctioned, and it was not error for the court to refuse sanction.

•Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur. H. G. Rawls, David M. Abrams, for plaintiff

in error, cited: 44 Ga. 588-9; 45 Ga. 538; 51 Ga. 122.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Smith v. Brand
44 Ga. 588 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1872)
Thrasher v. Anderson
45 Ga. 538 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1872)
Hill v. Clark
51 Ga. 122 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1874)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
113 S.E. 20, 28 Ga. App. 638, 1922 Ga. App. LEXIS 744, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrams-v-planters-bank-gactapp-1922.