Abrams v. McCall Co.

72 S.E. 64, 9 Ga. App. 699, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 298
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedSeptember 11, 1911
Docket3447
StatusPublished

This text of 72 S.E. 64 (Abrams v. McCall Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abrams v. McCall Co., 72 S.E. 64, 9 Ga. App. 699, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 298 (Ga. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

Powell, J.

1. Viewed in the light of the criteria announced in the case of Florence Wagon Works v. Salmon, 8 Ga. App. 197 (68 S. E. 866), and cases there cited, the amount claimed in the petition as liquidated damages was penalty, and the demurrer to the portion of the petition ■which sought a recovery therefor should have been sustained.

2. So. far as the petition sought to recover for the purcliase-price of goods sold and delivered, it was not subject to the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed in pari, and reversed in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Florence Wagon Works v. Salmon
68 S.E. 866 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 S.E. 64, 9 Ga. App. 699, 1911 Ga. App. LEXIS 298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrams-v-mccall-co-gactapp-1911.