Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.

278 A.D. 951, 105 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5342

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 11, 1951·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— In an action, under section 167 of the Insurance Law, to recover upon a policy of automobile liability insurance, judgment entered on an order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Johnston, Acting P. J., Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to deny the motion, on the ground that the moving papers fail to set forth evidentiary facts establishing the cause of action sufficiently to entitle plaintiff to judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— In an action, under section 167 of the Insurance Law, to recover upon a policy of automobile liability insurance, judgment entered on an order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Johnston, Acting P. J., Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to deny the motion, on the ground that the moving papers fail to set forth evidentiary facts establishing the cause of action sufficiently to entitle plaintiff to judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.

Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co., 278 A.D. 951, 105 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5342 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1951).

Pincite

278 A.D. 951 (Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related