Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.
This text of 278 A.D. 951 (Abrams v. Maryland Casualty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action, under section 167 of the Insurance Law, to recover upon a policy of automobile liability insurance, judgment entered on an order granting respondent’s motion for summary judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Johnston, Acting P. J., Sneed, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents and votes to reverse the judgment and to deny the motion, on the ground that the moving papers fail to set forth evidentiary facts establishing the cause of action sufficiently to entitle plaintiff to judgment under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
278 A.D. 951, 105 N.Y.S.2d 991, 1951 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5342, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrams-v-maryland-casualty-co-nyappdiv-1951.