Abrams v. Martin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abrams v. Martin

302 A.D.2d 594, 755 N.Y.S.2d 644, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1816

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 24, 2003

StatusPublished

This text of 302 A.D.2d 594 (Abrams v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abrams v. Martin, 302 A.D.2d 594, 755 N.Y.S.2d 644, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1816 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Larry D. Martin, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to enter judgment in an action entitled Abrams v Radin & Kleinman, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 12899/91.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner has failed to join persons who are necessary parties to the proceeding (see CPLR 1001). Ritter, J.P., Florio, S. Miller and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of mandamus, inter alia, to compel the respondent Larry D. Martin, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, to enter judgment in an action entitled Abrams v Radin & Kleinman, pending in the Supreme Court, Kings County, under Index No. 12899/91.

Adjudged that the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

The petitioner has failed to join persons who are necessary parties to the proceeding (see CPLR 1001). Ritter, J.P., Florio, S. Miller and Krausman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

302 A.D.2d 594, 755 N.Y.S.2d 644, 2003 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1816, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrams-v-martin-nyappdiv-2003.