Abrams v. Lee

14 Ill. 167
CourtIllinois Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1852
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 14 Ill. 167 (Abrams v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abrams v. Lee, 14 Ill. 167 (Ill. 1852).

Opinion

Treat, C. J.

The decision of the circuit court was clearly right. The case was already res adjudicóla. It was submitted to this court at a former term, in pursuance of a stipulation of the parties, that cross errors might be assigned on the record, and that such judgment might be entered here as the circuit court should have rendered. This court then came to the conclusion, on a thorough review of the whole case, that the circuit court erred in not rendering judgment for the defendant in bar of the action, and final judgment was thereupon entered here in his favor. Lee v. Abrams, 12 Illinois, 111. That was a full and final determination of the case. It was not open to any. further proceeding in the circuit court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoffman v. Hoffman
246 Ill. App. 60 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1927)
Schaefer v. Wunderle
39 N.E. 623 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1895)
State ex rel. Wolferman v. Superior Court
36 P. 443 (Washington Supreme Court, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
14 Ill. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrams-v-lee-ill-1852.