Abrams v. HBM Prenscia Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, S.D. New York
DecidedFebruary 26, 2020
Docket1:19-cv-10357
StatusUnknown

This text of Abrams v. HBM Prenscia Inc. (Abrams v. HBM Prenscia Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, S.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abrams v. HBM Prenscia Inc., (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Opinion

USDC SDNY WILMERHALE DOCUMENT ELECTRONICALLY FILED DOC #_______ Alan E. Schoenfeld DATE FILED:__2/26/2020 ee OOS +1 212 937 7294 (t) +1 212 230 8888 (f) alan.schoenfeld@wilmerhale.com

February 26, 2020 VIA ECF AND EMAIL Hon. Valerie E. Caproni United States District Court for the Southern District of New York 40 Foley Square, Room 240 New York, New York 10007 Re: Abrams v. HBM Prenscia Inc. et al., Case No. 19-cv-10357 (VEC) Dear Judge Caproni, In accordance with Rule 2.D of Your Honor’s Individual Practices in Civil Cases, the parties to the above-mentioned action respectfully submit for the Court’s review and endorsement a stipulation and proposed protective order. An executed copy of the stipulation and protective order is attached to this letter. We are also emailing a Microsoft Word version of the document to the Court at CaproniNYSDChambers@nysd.uscourts.gov, as required by Rule 2.D. Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Alan E. Schoenfeld Alan E. Schoenfeld

cc: Counsel of Record

Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr tt», 7 World Trade Center, 250 Greenwich Street, New York, New York 10007 Berlin Boston Brussels Denver Frankfurt London Los Angeles New York Palo Alto San Francisco Washington

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK SCOTT B. ABRAMS, No. 1:19-cv-10357-VEC Plaintiff, -against- STIPULATION AND{PROPOSED+ PROTECTIVE ORDER HBM PRENSCIA INC., SPECTRIS INC., AND SPECTRIS PLC, Defendants.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between the undersigned counsel for the parties, as follows: 1; For the purposes of this Stipulation and Protective Order (the “ORDER”), “DISCOVERY MATERIAL” shall include all written, recorded, or graphic material in any form or medium, and any information or data contained therein, disclosed or produced to any party in connection with this action in discovery or at trial and any other information that either party or any third party (herein referred to as the “Designating Party”) discloses to another party (herein referred to as the “Receiving Party”). DISCOVERY MATERIAL includes, without limitation, all items enumerated in Rule 26(a) and Rule 34(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, interrogatory answers, responses to requests for admissions, and deposition testimony, transcripts, and exhibits. DISCOVERY MATERIAL does not include publicly available documents. Zi All persons obtaining access to DISCOVERY MATERIAL shall use such material only in connection with this litigation, including preparation, settlement, trial, appeal, retrial, and enforcement of any judgment, and shall not use any DISCOVERY MATERIAL for any other purpose. In no event shall any person receiving access to a Designating Party’s DISCOVERY MATERIAL on behalf of a Receiving Party use it for commercial or competitive purposes or make

any public disclosure (other than as permitted in connection with this action) of the contents thereof. This Order shall not govern the use or disclosure by a party or other person of its own DISCOVERY MATERIAL. as The term “PROTECTED INFORMATION?” shall mean information as described in § 1 above that is designated by a Designating Party as “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL — ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” 4. The term “CONFIDENTIAL” shall refer to and include information that the Designating Party in good faith believes is subject to protection under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c) as containing a trade secret or other proprietary or confidential business, technical, commercial or financial information as used by the Designating Party in, or pertaining to, its business, which material is not publicly known and which the party would normally not reveal to third parties or would cause third parties to maintain in confidence. 3 The term “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY” shall refer to and include CONFIDENTIAL information that the Designating Party deems to constitute especially sensitive financial information, licensing information, or technical information proprietary to Scott Abrams or to HBM Prenscia Inc., Spectris Inc., and Spectris ple, and/or any of its subsidiaries or current or prospective customers, the disclosure of which is likely to cause significant harm to the competitive position of the Designating Party. 6. PROTECTED INFORMATION shall be designated and marked as follows: (a) Documents and things: All documents and things produced in this litigation may be designated as “PROTECTED INFORMATION” by placing the following legend, or an equivalent thereof, on any such document or thing prior to production, service, or filing: “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” Where feasible, such

legend shall be placed upon each page or thing containing PROTECTED INFORMATION, including each page of a TIFF image. (b) | Magnetic/Optical Media Documents: Where PROTECTED INFORMATION is produced in a machine-readable format or on magnetic or optical media (such as floppy diskette, tape, hard drive, DVD, CD-ROM, or digital memory), the disk, cartridge, reel, or medium container shall be marked with the appropriate confidentiality notice as described in 46(a) above. To the extent any of the information or data contained in or on such media is printed by the Receiving Party, all such printouts shall be marked as described in §6(a) above by the Receiving Party and shall be maintained as provided in 410 below. (c) Physical Exhibits: The confidential status of PROTECTED INFORMATION ina physical exhibit shall be indicated by placing a label on said physical exhibit designating it “CONFIDENTIAL” or “CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY.” (d) Deposition Proceedings: Designations of portions, or the entirety, of deposition transcripts (including exhibits) as CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL - ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY shall be made by a statement to such effect on the record in the course of the deposition, or upon review of such transcript by counsel for the Designating Party within ten (10) business days after counsel’s receipt of the transcript. Upon designation of the transcript on the record during the deposition, only those persons allowed to have access to said CONFIDENTIAL or □□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□□ EYES ONLY information under the terms of this Order may remain in the room during such portion of the deposition. The Court Reporter or other person recording the proceedings shall segregate any portion of the transcript of the deposition or hearing which has been stated to contain CONFIDENTIAL or CONFIDENTIAL—ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY information and may furnish copies of these segregated portions, in a sealed envelope, only

to the deponent as required by law, to the Court, and to counsel for the parties bound by the terms of this Order. (e) During the first ten (10) business days after counsel’s receipt of the transcripts, each deposition transcript shall be treated as CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Order unless a deposition exhibit is marked CONFIDENTIAL-ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY or there is a statement on the record during the deposition marking part of it as CONFIDENTIAL-— ATTORNEYS’ EYES ONLY. With regard to designations made within ten (10) business days after receipt of the deposition transcript, counsel shall make such designations by sending written notice to the Court Reporter and to counsel for the parties. The notice shall reference this Order and identify the pages and/or exhibits so designated. All copies of transcripts thus designated shall be marked with a notice indicating the confidentiality of the material therein and shall be governed by the terms of this Order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Abrams v. HBM Prenscia Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrams-v-hbm-prenscia-inc-nysd-2020.