Abrams v. Amant

125 A.D. 927, 110 N.Y.S. 1121

This text of 125 A.D. 927 (Abrams v. Amant) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abrams v. Amant, 125 A.D. 927, 110 N.Y.S. 1121 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1908).

Opinion

It was competent for the defendant to show that the bill of sale was intended merely as security. The evidence to show this being uncontradicted, should not have been disregarded. Judgment of the Municipal. Court reversed and new trial ordered costs to abide the event. Woodward, Jenks, Hooker, Gaynor and Miller, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
125 A.D. 927, 110 N.Y.S. 1121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrams-v-amant-nyappdiv-1908.