Abrams v. 4-6-8, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abrams v. 4-6-8, LLC

123 A.D.3d 450, 996 N.Y.S.2d 526

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 4, 2014·No. 13666 570765/12·Published

Opinion

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered December 28, 2012, which affirmed a judgment of the Civil Court, New York County (David B. Cohen, J.), entered on or about January 28, 2010, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the petition, and reversed a judgment, same court (David J. Kaplan, J.), entered March 21, 2011, after a hearing, awarding respondents 4-6-8, LLC, Transrealty Inc. and Michael King (the owner) attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the petition was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence, consisting largely of credibility findings with respect to the parties’ experts. The owner was the prevailing party in having obtained dismissal (see Solow v Wellner, 205 AD2d 339 [1st Dept 1994], affd 86 NY2d 582 [1995]). However, its claim for attorneys’ fees was properly denied, this matter having been unnecessarily prolonged by both sides (see Solow Mgt. Corp. v Lowe, 1 AD3d 135 [1st Dept 2003]).

We do not reach the collateral issue regarding the interpretation of the attorneys’ fees provision of the lease because it was not raised at the trial level.

We have considered the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Appellate Term of the Supreme Court, First Department, entered December 28, 2012, which affirmed a judgment of the Civil Court, New York County (David B. Cohen, J.), entered on or about January 28, 2010, after a nonjury trial, dismissing the petition, and reversed a judgment, same court (David J. Kaplan, J.), entered March 21, 2011, after a hearing, awarding respondents 4-6-8, LLC, Transrealty Inc. and Michael King (the owner) attorneys’ fees, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Dismissal of the petition was based on a fair interpretation of the evidence, consisting largely of credibility findings with respect to the parties’ experts. The owner was the prevailing party in having obtained dismissal (see Solow v Wellner, 205 AD2d 339 [1st Dept 1994], affd 86 NY2d 582 [1995]). However, its claim for attorneys’ fees was properly denied, this matter having been unnecessarily prolonged by both sides (see Solow Mgt. Corp. v Lowe, 1 AD3d 135 [1st Dept 2003]).

We do not reach the collateral issue regarding the interpretation of the attorneys’ fees provision of the lease because it was not raised at the trial level.

We have considered the parties’ other arguments for affirmative relief and find them unavailing.

Concur — Tom, J.P., Sweeny, DeGrasse, Feinman and Gische, JJ.

Abrams v. 4-6-8, LLC, 123 A.D.3d 450, 996 N.Y.S.2d 526 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

123 A.D.3d 450 (Abrams v. 4-6-8, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related