Abramowitz v. 145 East 16th Street LLC
50 A.D.3d 594, 855 N.Y.S.2d 365
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Edward H. Lehner, J.), entered January 12, 2007, which granted plaintiff’s motion for a Yellowstone injunction, unanimously affirmed, with costs.
Under the circumstances presented, it was a proper exercise of discretion to grant plaintiff residential tenant Yellowstone relief despite the availability of RPAPL 753 (4) (see Post v 120 E. End Ave. Corp., 62 NY2d 19, 28 [1984]; see e.g. Stolz v 111 Tenants Corp., 3 AD3d 421 [2004]). Concur—Saxe, J.P., Nardelli, Buckley and Catterson, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abramowitz v. 145 East 16th Street LLC, 50 A.D.3d 594, 855 N.Y.S.2d 365 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).
50 A.D.3d 594 (Abramowitz v. 145 East 16th Street LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Post v. 120 East End Avenue Corp.
464 N.E.2d 125 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
Stolz v. 111 Tenants Corp.
3 A.D.3d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2004)