Abram v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Abram v. State

782 S.W.2d 779, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1697, 1989 WL 147006

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 5, 1989

DocketNo. 56546

StatusPublished

This text of 782 S.W.2d 779 (Abram v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abram v. State, 782 S.W.2d 779, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1697, 1989 WL 147006 (Mo. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

Movant argues Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) applies for evaluation of his motion. His direct appeal became final in 1982. State v. Abram, 632 S.W.2d 60 (Mo.App.1982). As in Washington v. State, 772 [780]*780S.W.2d 728, 730 (Mo.App.1989), Batson is inapplicable. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no precedential value; therefore, we affirm pursuant to' Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals from the denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

Movant argues Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986) applies for evaluation of his motion. His direct appeal became final in 1982. State v. Abram, 632 S.W.2d 60 (Mo.App.1982). As in Washington v. State, 772 [780]*780S.W.2d 728, 730 (Mo.App.1989), Batson is inapplicable. The findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous and an extended opinion would have no precedential value; therefore, we affirm pursuant to' Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

782 S.W.2d 779, 1989 Mo. App. LEXIS 1697, 1989 WL 147006, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abram-v-state-moctapp-1989.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack