Abraka Okposio v. Barry University, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedJanuary 2, 2025
Docket24-13786
StatusUnpublished

This text of Abraka Okposio v. Barry University, Inc. (Abraka Okposio v. Barry University, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abraka Okposio v. Barry University, Inc., (11th Cir. 2025).

Opinion

USCA11 Case: 24-13786 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2025 Page: 1 of 3

[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13786 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________

ABRAKA VANESSA OKPOSIO, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus BARRY UNIVERSITY, INC., a Florida corporation, BETHANY PIERPONT, individually, LETICIA M. DIAZ, ROXANNA P. CRUZ, MARIA L. ALVAREZ, et al.,

Defendants-Appellees. USCA11 Case: 24-13786 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2025 Page: 2 of 3

2 Opinion of the Court 24-13786

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:20-cv-23814-DPG ____________________

Before ROSENBAUM, BRANCH, and LAGOA, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. Abraka Okposio, proceeding pro se, appeals the district court’s October 17, 2024 order denying her motion for default judgment. We lack jurisdiction over Okposio’s appeal because the dis- trict court’s October 17 order was not final and appealable, given that Okposio’s third amended complaint remains pending before the district court. See 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (providing that appellate ju- risdiction is generally limited to “final decisions of the district courts”); Acheron Cap., Ltd. v. Mukamal, 22 F.4th 979, 986 (11th Cir. 2022) (providing that an appealable final order ends the litigation on the merits and leaves nothing for the court to do but execute its judgment); Mass. Cas. Inc. Co. v. Forman, 469 F.2d 259, 260 n.1 (5th Cir. 1972) (“The denial of the [] motion for default judgment is not an appealable decision.”). The order is also not effectively unre- viewable on appeal from a final judgment resolving the case on the merits. See Plaintiff A v. Schair, 744 F.3d 1247, 1252-53 (11th Cir. 2014) (explaining that a ruling that does not conclude the litigation USCA11 Case: 24-13786 Document: 11-1 Date Filed: 01/02/2025 Page: 3 of 3

24-13786 Opinion of the Court 3

may be appealed under the collateral order doctrine if it, inter alia, is “effectively unreviewable on appeal from a final judgment”). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

A v. Richard Wayne Schair
744 F.3d 1247 (Eleventh Circuit, 2014)
Acheron Capital, Ltd. v. Barry Mukamal
22 F.4th 979 (Eleventh Circuit, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Abraka Okposio v. Barry University, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraka-okposio-v-barry-university-inc-ca11-2025.