Abrahamsen v. Sperry Gyroscope Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abrahamsen v. Sperry Gyroscope Co.

54 A.D.2d 570, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13903

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 27, 1976

StatusPublished

This text of 54 A.D.2d 570 (Abrahamsen v. Sperry Gyroscope Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abrahamsen v. Sperry Gyroscope Co., 54 A.D.2d 570, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13903 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Pincite

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 5, 1976, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated February 4, 1976, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint as time-barred. Determination confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with the division and the appeal board that the discrimination complaint was not timely filed in accordance with subdivision 5 of section 297 of the Executive Law. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Proceeding pursuant to section 298 of the Executive Law to review an order of the State Human Rights Appeal Board, dated April 5, 1976, which affirmed an order of the State Division of Human Rights, dated February 4, 1976, which dismissed petitioner’s complaint as time-barred. Determination confirmed and petition dismissed, without costs or disbursements. We agree with the division and the appeal board that the discrimination complaint was not timely filed in accordance with subdivision 5 of section 297 of the Executive Law. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Martuscello, Cohalan, Damiani and Shapiro, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

54 A.D.2d 570, 386 N.Y.S.2d 1016, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13903, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrahamsen-v-sperry-gyroscope-co-nyappdiv-1976.