Abrahams v. Frank
This text of 264 A.D. 866 (Abrahams v. Frank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Action to recover damages on the ground that defendant’s testator, in selling a gasoline service station to plaintiff, fraudulently represented that the premises were not restricted to the sale of any particular brand of gasoline and petroleum products. Judgment in favor of defendant dismissing the complaint, and order denying motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial, unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — -Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Adel, Taylor and Close, JJ. [See 265 App. Div. 823, amdg. decision.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
264 A.D. 866, 36 N.Y.S.2d 241, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abrahams-v-frank-nyappdiv-1942.