Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
___________ FILED September 11, 2024 No. 23-20337 Lyle W. Cayce ___________ Clerk
Abraham Watkins Nichols Agosto Aziz & Stogner,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Edward Festeryga,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CV-4249 ______________________________
ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC
(Opinion July 25, 2024, 5 Cir., 2024, 109 F.4th 810)
Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, No. 23-20337
IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion is this case dated July 25, 2024, is VACATED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
113 F.4th 1019 (Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.