Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga

113 F.4th 1019
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided September 11, 2024·No. 23-20337·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

___________ FILED September 11, 2024 No. 23-20337 Lyle W. Cayce ___________ Clerk

Abraham Watkins Nichols Agosto Aziz & Stogner,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Edward Festeryga,

Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CV-4249 ______________________________

ON PETITION FOR REHEARING EN BANC

(Opinion July 25, 2024, 5 Cir., 2024, 109 F.4th 810)

Before Richman, Chief Judge, and Jones, Smith, Stewart, Elrod, Southwick, Haynes, Graves, Higginson, Willett, Ho, Duncan, Engelhardt, Oldham, Wilson, Douglas, and Ramirez, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: A member of the court having requested a poll on the petition for rehearing en banc, and a majority of the circuit judges in regular active service and not disqualified having voted in favor, No. 23-20337

IT IS ORDERED that this cause shall be reheard by the court en banc with oral argument on a date hereafter to be fixed. The Clerk will specify a briefing schedule for the filing of supplemental briefs. Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 41.3, the panel opinion is this case dated July 25, 2024, is VACATED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga, 113 F.4th 1019 (5th Cir. 2024).

113 F.4th 1019 (Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Abraham Watkins v. Festeryga
138 F.4th 252 (Fifth Circuit, 2025)