Abraham v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Abraham v. United States

61 Cust. Ct. 645

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedSeptember 3, 1968

DocketNo. P68/379; protest 66/43465 (New York)

StatusPublished

This text of 61 Cust. Ct. 645 (Abraham v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abraham v. United States, 61 Cust. Ct. 645 (cusc 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Torch Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein said batteries were held to be separately dutiable, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Maletz, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise covered by the foregoing protest consists of batteries, classified as entireties with flashlights, similar in all material respects to those the subject of Torch Mfg. Co., Inc. v. United States (57 Cust. Ct. 521, C.D. 2863), wherein said batteries were held to be separately dutiable, the claim of the plaintiff was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

61 Cust. Ct. 645, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-united-states-cusc-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack