Abraham v. Naul
This text of 402 So. 2d 191 (Abraham v. Naul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action commenced as a suit for damages brought by Mark Abraham against the tortfeasor, Ronald M. Naul, his liability insurer, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, and Abraham’s underin-sured motorist insurer, Aetna Casualty & Surety Company for personal injuries and property damages allegedly caused when Naul’s vehicle negligently, encroached into Abraham’s lane of traffic on a four-lane highway. Subsequently, Aetna filed third party demands against Naul and his liability insurer, Southern Farm Bureau Casualty Insurance Company, the dealer, Coleman Oldsmobile, Inc. and the manufacturer, Winnebago Industries, Inc. Essentially, the basis for the third party demands was that Coleman was liable for negligently failing to properly close the engine cover prior to delivery, or Winnebago was liable under products liability for manufacturing a defective product. Both Coleman and Winnebago filed peremptory exceptions, which were sustained by the trial judge and the third party demands dismissed at Aetna’s costs.1 Aetna appealed.
We affirm; under the holding of Niemann v. Travelers Insurance Company, 368 So.2d 1003 (La. 1979), as followed by Bond v. Commercial Union Assurance Companies, 387 So.2d 617 (La.App. 3 Cir. 1980), the UM insurer has no rights under LSA-R.S. 22:14Q6D(4) other than the right to reimbursement from any proceeds which the insured actually recovers from the underin-sured tortfeasor; consequently, the trial judge was correct in maintaining the peremptory exceptions. Costs are assessed against the appellant.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
402 So. 2d 191, 1981 La. App. LEXIS 4312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-naul-lactapp-1981.