Abraham v. City of New York

51 A.D.3d 576, 857 N.Y.S.2d 490
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Abraham v. City of New York. Read the opinion of the Court — 39 A.D.3d 21

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Marilyn Shafer, J.), entered February 26, 2007, which granted defendants-respondents’ respective motions for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against them, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendants established their prima facie entitlement to summary judgment, and the evidence offered by plaintiff in opposition to defendants’ motions failed to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether defendants engaged in snow removal on the public sidewalk where plaintiff slipped and fell (see Stein v State St. Bank & Trust Co. of Conn. N.A., 279 AD2d 427 [2001]). Concur—Andrias, J.P., Saxe, Sweeny, Moskowitz and DeGrasse, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraham v. City of New York, 51 A.D.3d 576, 857 N.Y.S.2d 490 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2008).

51 A.D.3d 576 (Abraham v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stein v. State Street Bank & Trust Co. of Connecticut National Association
279 A.D.2d 427 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2001)