Abraham v. Chelsea Piers Management, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Abraham v. Chelsea Piers Management, Inc.

39 N.E.3d 473, 26 N.Y.3d 963, 17 N.Y.S.3d 672

DecidedSeptember 17, 2015

StatusPublished

This text of 39 N.E.3d 473 (Abraham v. Chelsea Piers Management, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abraham v. Chelsea Piers Management, Inc., 39 N.E.3d 473, 26 N.Y.3d 963, 17 N.Y.S.3d 672 (N.Y. 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division properly concluded, under the circumstances presented here, that the decedent’s actions were not foreseeable.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott, AbdusSalaam, Stein and Fahey; Judge Rivera taking no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order affirmed, with costs, and certified question answered in the affirmative. The Appellate Division properly concluded, under the circumstances presented here, that the decedent’s actions were not foreseeable.

Concur: Chief Judge Lippman and Judges Pigott, AbdusSalaam, Stein and Fahey; Judge Rivera taking no part.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

39 N.E.3d 473, 26 N.Y.3d 963, 17 N.Y.S.3d 672, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-chelsea-piers-management-inc-ny-2015.