Abraham v. Alford

64 Ala. 281
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedDecember 15, 1879
StatusPublished
Cited by22 cases

This text of 64 Ala. 281 (Abraham v. Alford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abraham v. Alford, 64 Ala. 281 (Ala. 1879).

Opinion

BRICKELL, C. J.

This was an action of trover for the conversion of a mule, commenced before a justice of the peace, in which the appellee was plaintiff, and the appellant was defendant. The defendant failing to appear before the justice, judgment by default was taken against him; and after hearing evidence, the justice rendered a final judgment for fifty dollars damages, and four dollars and eighty cents, eostsof suit. From that judgment, the defendant appealed’ to the City Court; and not appearing in that court, a final judgment by default was rendered against him, without the intervention of a jury, for the amount of the judgment rendered by the justice. This was error. Appeals from judgments of a justice of the peace are triable de novo, upon their merits, without regal’d to the judgment of the justice. By the appeal, that judgment is vacated, and ceases to have any force or effect, either as an estoppel, or as matter of evidence. Freeman on Judgments, § 828. The judgment of the justice is not reversed, or affirmed; but a new, distinct, and independent judgment, as may be required by the merits shown on the trial, is rendered by the City or Circuit Court. The rendition of a final judgment by default, in an action of trover, without the intervention of a jury to assess the damages, is unwarranted.

Reversed and remanded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Woods v. State
261 So. 3d 483 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama, 2016)
Ex Parte Sorsby
12 So. 3d 139 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2007)
Ex Parte State
907 So. 2d 461 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 2005)
STATE DEPT. OF INDUS. RELATIONS v. Page
362 So. 2d 263 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1978)
Tarver v. Household Finance Corporation
253 So. 2d 333 (Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama, 1971)
Cloverleaf Land Company Inc. v. State
163 So. 2d 602 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1964)
Ex Parte State Ex Rel. Sullivan
78 So. 2d 322 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1955)
Watson v. Ohio Contract Purchase Co.
149 So. 350 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1933)
Bowen v. Crow
141 So. 357 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1932)
Kemp v. York
81 So. 195 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1918)
Slaughter v. Martin
63 So. 689 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1913)
House v. City of Anniston
59 So. 686 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1912)
Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Lancaster
121 Ala. 471 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Guscott v. Roden & Co.
112 Ala. 632 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1896)
Independent Publishing Co. v. American Press Ass'n
102 Ala. 475 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)
McConnell v. Worns
102 Ala. 587 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1893)
Weedon & Dent v. Clark
94 Ala. 505 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1891)
Lehman, Durr & Co. v. Hudmon Bros.
79 Ala. 532 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1885)
Harsh, McLean & Hardison v. Heflin
76 Ala. 499 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1884)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
64 Ala. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-alford-ala-1879.