Abraham v. Abraham

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Abraham v. Abraham

40 A.D.2d 519, 335 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4037

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 5, 1972

StatusPublished

This text of 40 A.D.2d 519 (Abraham v. Abraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abraham v. Abraham, 40 A.D.2d 519, 335 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4037 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1972).

Pincite

Opinion

In a support proceeding, petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated February 22, 1972, as amended by a later order of the same date, which awarded respondent exclusive possession of a co-operative apartment (the marital home) and directed respondent to pay petitioner $20 per week support. Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the weekly support to $35. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the testimony at the support hearing as to petitioner’s needs and respondent’s ability to pay warrants the increase directed herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a support proceeding, petitioner appeals from an order of the Family Court, Queens County, dated February 22, 1972, as amended by a later order of the same date, which awarded respondent exclusive possession of a co-operative apartment (the marital home) and directed respondent to pay petitioner $20 per week support. Order modified, on the facts, by increasing the weekly support to $35. As so modified, order affirmed, without costs. In our opinion, the testimony at the support hearing as to petitioner’s needs and respondent’s ability to pay warrants the increase directed herein. Hopkins, Acting P. J., Latham, Shapiro, Gulotta and Christ, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 A.D.2d 519, 335 N.Y.S.2d 369, 1972 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4037, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-abraham-nyappdiv-1972.