Abraham v. Abraham
338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15573
Opinion
Affirmed. See: Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975); Huber v. Huber, 26 Ill.App.2d 207, 167 N.E.2d 431; People ex rel. Strauss v. Steindler, 223 App.Div. 230, 227 N.Y.S. 726; Anno. 88 A.L.R.2d 148. Compare Cortina v. Cortina, 108 So.2d 63 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1958); Rodgers v. Williamson, Tex.1973, 489 S.W.2d 558.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Abraham v. Abraham, 338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).
338 So. 2d 70 (Abraham v. Abraham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Cortina v. Cortina
108 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Rodgers v. Williamson
489 S.W.2d 558 (Texas Supreme Court, 1973)
Dinkel v. Dinkel
322 So. 2d 22 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Huber v. Huber
167 N.E.2d 431 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1960)
People ex rel. Strauss v. Steindler
223 A.D. 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)