Abraham v. Abraham

338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15573
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 28, 1976
DocketNo. 75-1320
StatusPublished

This text of 338 So. 2d 70 (Abraham v. Abraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abraham v. Abraham, 338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15573 (Fla. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See: Dinkel v. Dinkel, 322 So.2d 22 (Fla.1975); Huber v. Huber, 26 Ill.App.2d 207, 167 N.E.2d 431; People ex rel. Strauss v. Steindler, 223 App.Div. 230, 227 N.Y.S. 726; Anno. 88 A.L.R.2d 148. Compare Cortina v. Cortina, 108 So.2d 63 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1958); Rodgers v. Williamson, Tex.1973, 489 S.W.2d 558.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cortina v. Cortina
108 So. 2d 63 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)
Rodgers v. Williamson
489 S.W.2d 558 (Texas Supreme Court, 1973)
Dinkel v. Dinkel
322 So. 2d 22 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Huber v. Huber
167 N.E.2d 431 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1960)
People ex rel. Strauss v. Steindler
223 A.D. 230 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1928)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
338 So. 2d 70, 1976 Fla. App. LEXIS 15573, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-abraham-fladistctapp-1976.