Abraham v. Abraham

775 So. 2d 937, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1056, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2254, 2000 WL 1707148
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided November 16, 2000·No. No. SC95799·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Abraham v. Abraham, 730 So.2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING and QUINCE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraham v. Abraham, 775 So. 2d 937, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1056, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2254, 2000 WL 1707148 (Fla. 2000).

775 So. 2d 937 (Abraham v. Abraham) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wright v. Lewis
870 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)