Abraham v. Abraham

775 So. 2d 937, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1056, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2254, 2000 WL 1707148
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedNovember 16, 2000
DocketNo. SC95799
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 775 So. 2d 937 (Abraham v. Abraham) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abraham v. Abraham, 775 So. 2d 937, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1056, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2254, 2000 WL 1707148 (Fla. 2000).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We initially accepted review of the decision in Abraham v. Abraham, 730 So.2d 746 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999), based on alleged express and direct conflict under article V, section 3(b)(3) of the Florida Constitution. Upon further consideration, we find that jurisdiction was improvidently granted. Accordingly, we hereby dismiss review of this cause.

It is so ordered.

WELLS, C.J., and SHAW, HARDING and QUINCE, JJ., concur. ANSTEAD, J., dissents with an opinion, in which PARIENTE and LEWIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wright v. Lewis
870 So. 2d 179 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
775 So. 2d 937, 25 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 1056, 2000 Fla. LEXIS 2254, 2000 WL 1707148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-v-abraham-fla-2000.