Abraham & Straus v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

Abraham & Straus v. United States

57 Cust. Ct. 791

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedJune 30, 1966

DocketNo. P66/143

StatusPublished

This text of 57 Cust. Ct. 791 (Abraham & Straus v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abraham & Straus v. United States, 57 Cust. Ct. 791 (cusc 1966).

Pincite

Opinion

Nao, C.J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of knives similar in all material respects to those the subject of National Carloading Corp. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2529), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” are similar in all material respects to those the subject of C.D. 2529, supra, except that said knives are with handles other than nickel, silver or steel, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Nao, C.J.

In accordance with, stipulation of counsel that the items of merchandise marked “A” covered by the foregoing protests consist of knives similar in all material respects to those the subject of National Carloading Corp. v. United States (54 Cust. Ct. 178, C.D. 2529), and that the items of merchandise marked “B” are similar in all material respects to those the subject of C.D. 2529, supra, except that said knives are with handles other than nickel, silver or steel, the claim of the plaintiffs was sustained.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 Cust. Ct. 791, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-straus-v-united-states-cusc-1966.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack