Abraham & Straus, Inc. v. United States

22 Cust. Ct. 227, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1296
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Abraham & Straus, Inc. v. United States. Read the opinion of the Court — 22 Cust. Ct. 153
United States Customs Court·Decided January 20, 1949·No. No. 52834; protests 58624-K, etc. (New York)·Published

Opinion

[228]*228Opinion by

Ekwall, J.

In accordance with stipulation of counsel the court found that the facts herein agreed upon were such as to bring the case within the holding in John Barr v. United States (11 Cust. Ct. 88, C. D. 801), which record was incorporated herein. (See John Barr v. United States, 324 U. S. 83.) In accordance therewith it was held that the currency of the invoices should be converted at the buying rate in the New York market at noon on the day of exportation (the “free” rate of exchange for pounds sterling), as certified by the Federal Reserve bank and set forth by the collector on each of the entries involved. The protests were sustained to this extent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraham & Straus, Inc. v. United States, 22 Cust. Ct. 227, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 1296 (cusc 1949).

22 Cust. Ct. 227 (Abraham & Straus, Inc. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barr v. United States
324 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1945)
Barr v. United States
11 Cust. Ct. 88 (U.S. Customs Court, 1943)