Abraham Mendiola-Sanchez v. Michael Mukasey
This text of 476 F. App'x 125 (Abraham Mendiola-Sanchez v. Michael Mukasey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
*126 ORDER
The government’s petition for panel rehearing is granted.
The memorandum disposition filed on June 9, 2011, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition is filed concurrently with this order.
MEMORANDUM **
Abraham Mendiola-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order pretermi-ting his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir.2011), and we deny the petition for review.
The BIA did not err in determining that Mendiola-Sanchez may not impute his father’s lawful permanent residence for purposes of meeting the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(1) — (2). See Sawyers v. Holder, 684 F.3d 911 (9th Cir.2012) (per curiam).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 F. App'x 125, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-mendiola-sanchez-v-michael-mukasey-ca9-2012.