Abraham Mendiola-Sanchez v. Michael Mukasey

476 F. App'x 125
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 3, 2012·No. 08-71522·Unpublished

Opinion

*126 ORDER

The government’s petition for panel rehearing is granted.

The memorandum disposition filed on June 9, 2011, is withdrawn. A replacement memorandum disposition is filed concurrently with this order.

MEMORANDUM **

Abraham Mendiola-Sanchez, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeal’s (“BIA”) order dismissing his appeal from an immigration judge’s order pretermi-ting his application for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review de novo questions of law, Gil v. Holder, 651 F.3d 1000, 1002 (9th Cir.2011), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not err in determining that Mendiola-Sanchez may not impute his father’s lawful permanent residence for purposes of meeting the requirements of 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(1) — (2). See Sawyers v. Holder, 684 F.3d 911 (9th Cir.2012) (per curiam).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9 th Cir. R. 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraham Mendiola-Sanchez v. Michael Mukasey, 476 F. App'x 125 (9th Cir. 2012).

476 F. App'x 125 (Abraham Mendiola-Sanchez v. Michael Mukasey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gil v. Holder
651 F.3d 1000 (Ninth Circuit, 2011)
Sawyers v. Mukasey
684 F.3d 911 (Ninth Circuit, 2012)