Abraham M. Sonnabend v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Abraham M. Sonnabend

267 F.2d 319, 3 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1505, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3824
CourtCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit
DecidedMay 21, 1959
Docket5449
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 267 F.2d 319 (Abraham M. Sonnabend v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Abraham M. Sonnabend) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abraham M. Sonnabend v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Abraham M. Sonnabend, 267 F.2d 319, 3 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1505, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3824 (1st Cir. 1959).

Opinion

267 F.2d 319

59-1 USTC P 9475

Abraham M. SONNABEND et al., Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Petitioner,
v.
Abraham M. SONNABEND et al., Respondents.

Nos. 5448, 5449.

United States Court of Appeals First Circuit.

May 21, 1959.

On petitions for review of the decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

John P. Allison, New York City, with whom Stanley W. Herzfeld and Marshall, Bratter, Greene, Allison & Tucker, New York City, on brief, for Abraham M. Sonnabend et al.

Grant W. Wiprud, Attorney, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., with whom Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Lee A. Jackson and Harry Baum, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., on brief, for Commissioner of Internal Revenue.

Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit judges.

PER CURIAM.

These petitions for review were argued jointly with the petitions in Goodstein v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, and Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Goodstein, 1 Cir., 267 F.2d 127, and presented substantially the same questions. Consequently the decision of the Tax Court is affirmed on the basis of our opinion in the Goodstein cases decided today.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
267 F.2d 319, 3 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1505, 1959 U.S. App. LEXIS 3824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-m-sonnabend-v-commissioner-of-internal-rev-ca1-1959.