Abraham Grant v. State of Arkansas

2020 Ark. 282

• Court: Supreme Court of Arkansas
• Decided: September 24, 2020
• Status: Published

Opinion

Cite as 2020 Ark. 282 SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-19-983

ABRAHAM GRANT Opinion Delivered September 24, 2020 APPELLANT

V. PRO SE MOTIONS TO DISCREDIT APPELLEE’S RESPONSIVE BRIEF, FOR STATE OF ARKANSAS CONSTITUTION OF STATE OF APPELLEE ARKANSAS OF 1874 PREAMBLE, FOR JUDGMENT ON PLEADING, OF FACTS TO SUPREME COURT SESSION, AND FOR CONSTITUTION OF ARKANSAS AND STATUTORY LAW [LINCOLN COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, NO. 40CV-19-115]

APPEAL DISMISSED; MOTIONS MOOT.

JOHN DAN KEMP, Chief Justice

Pending before this court is appellant Abraham Grant’s motion to discredit or

strike appellee’s responsive brief, “Motion for Constitution of State of Arkansas of 1874

Preamble,” motion for judgment on pleading, motion of facts to Supreme Court session,

and motion for constitution of Arkansas and statutory law. Grant’s pro se motions were

filed in his pending appeal from the Lincoln County Circuit Court’s denial of his petition

to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-90-111

(Repl. 2016). We dismiss the appeal, and the motions are moot. Grant was found guilty by a Phillips County Circuit Court jury of capital murder

and first-degree battery. He was sentenced to life in prison without parole for the capital-

murder conviction and five years for first-degree battery with the sentences to run

concurrently. We affirmed. Grant v. State, 357 Ark. 91, 161 S.W.3d 785 (2004).

As stated above, Grant filed his petition to correct an illegal sentence in Lincoln

County where he is incarcerated. The Lincoln County Circuit Court denied the petition,

finding that it was an untimely petition under Rule 37.2 of the Arkansas Rules of Criminal

Procedure (2019).

Petitions for relief under Rule 37.1 and Arkansas Code Annotated section 16-90-

111 must be filed in the circuit court where the judgment of conviction was entered. Wesley

v. Hobbs, 2014 Ark. 260 (per curiam). Because Grant did not proceed in the proper circuit

court, the Lincoln County Circuit Court lacked jurisdiction to address his petition to

correct an illegal sentence. When the circuit court lacks jurisdiction, the appellate court

also lacks jurisdiction. Clark v. State, 362 Ark. 545, 210 S.W.3d 59 (2005). Thus, we

dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, which renders the motions moot.

Abraham Grant, pro se appellant.

Leslie Rutledge, Att’y Gen., by: Joseph Karl Luebke, Ass’t Att’y Gen., for appellee.