Abraham Goldberg v. Morris Ravitz, Emma Ravitz
228 F.2d 466, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 119
This text of 228 F.2d 466 (Abraham Goldberg v. Morris Ravitz, Emma Ravitz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Abraham Goldberg v. Morris Ravitz, Emma Ravitz, 228 F.2d 466, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 119 (D.C. Cir. 1955).
Opinion
The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in a suit to set aside a conveyance of real estate in which the grantor was the husband of the grantee. We find no error affecting substantial rights.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
William P. H. Flanagan v. Philip Young
228 F.2d 466 (D.C. Circuit, 1955)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
228 F.2d 466, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 119, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-goldberg-v-morris-ravitz-emma-ravitz-cadc-1955.