Abraham Goldberg v. Morris Ravitz, Emma Ravitz

228 F.2d 466, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 119
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided December 22, 1955·No. 12708·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment for the defendant in a suit to set aside a conveyance of real estate in which the grantor was the husband of the grantee. We find no error affecting substantial rights.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abraham Goldberg v. Morris Ravitz, Emma Ravitz, 228 F.2d 466, 97 U.S. App. D.C. 119 (D.C. Cir. 1955).

228 F.2d 466 (Abraham Goldberg v. Morris Ravitz, Emma Ravitz) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

William P. H. Flanagan v. Philip Young
228 F.2d 466 (D.C. Circuit, 1955)