Abraham Benenson and Diana Benenson v. Alla Marchenko
This text of Abraham Benenson and Diana Benenson v. Alla Marchenko (Abraham Benenson and Diana Benenson v. Alla Marchenko) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 1, 2025. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D25-0770 Lower Tribunal No. 23-4594-CC-23 ________________
Abraham Benenson and Diana Benenson, Appellants,
vs.
Alla Marchenko, Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Caryn Schwartz, Senior Judge.
Abraham Benenson and Diana Benenson, in proper persons.
Law Offices of Andre G. Raikhelson and Andre G. Raikhelson (Boca Raton), for appellee.
Before SCALES, C.J., and LOBREE and GOODEN, JJ.
PER CURIAM.
Diana Minina a/k/a Diana Benenson and Farid Aghayev a/k/a Abraham Benenson (“Tenants”), the defendants below, appeal the trial court's final
judgment awarding Alla Marchenko (“Landlord”), the plaintiff below,
damages in the total sum of $15,075.00 for the Tenants’ default in payment
of rent under the parties’ lease agreement.
We summarily affirm the trial court’s final judgment because the
Tenants have not provided a transcript of the non-jury trial proceedings and,
thus, have failed to bring a proper record for this court's review. See Fla. R.
App. P. 9.315(a). As the Tenants have failed to meet their responsibility to
ensure that a record adequate to permit resolution of the issues raised on
appeal be prepared and transmitted to the appellate court, the Tenants fail
to meet their burden of establishing reversible error to overcome the
presumption of correctness afforded to the trial court's decision. See
Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee, 377 So. 2d 1150, 1152 (Fla. 1979)
(it is the duty of the appellant to bring before the appellate court a record
which is adequate to support his or her appeal); Gaspard v. Innocent, 389
So. 3d 638, 639 (Fla. 3d DCA 2023) (holding that affirmance is required
where there is no transcript or proper substitute and no fundamental error on
the face of the order appealed).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abraham Benenson and Diana Benenson v. Alla Marchenko, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-benenson-and-diana-benenson-v-alla-marchenko-fladistctapp-2025.