Abraham & Associates, Inc. v. Surrey Holding Corp.
This text of 939 So. 2d 332 (Abraham & Associates, Inc. v. Surrey Holding Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, Abraham & Associates, Inc., appeals from the trial court’s dismissal with prejudice of its five-count Third Amended Complaint. Abraham, a licensed real estate broker, alleges that it brought together the seller, Surrey Holding Corporation, and the buyers, Silveri Leasing, Inc. and Mike Silveri, who went through with the sale and purchase of Surrey’s property without Abraham’s knowledge. The causes of action asserted by Abraham are (1) procuring cause, (2) breach of an oral listing agreement, (3) breach of a completely performed unilateral offer, (4) unjust enrichment, and (5) tortious interference with a business relationship.
This court reviews an order granting a motion to dismiss de novo. We find that the trial court erred in dismissing the complaint because the allegations made are sufficient to state a cause of action in each count.
Reversed and Remanded for Further Proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
939 So. 2d 332, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 17300, 2006 WL 2956314, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-associates-inc-v-surrey-holding-corp-fladistctapp-2006.