Abraham Alfonso Camacho v. State
This text of Abraham Alfonso Camacho v. State (Abraham Alfonso Camacho v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00102-CR
Abraham Alfonso CAMACHO, Appellant
v.
The STATE of Texas, Appellee
From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-8752W Honorable Fred Shannon, Judge Presiding
PER CURIAM
Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice
Delivered and Filed: July 7, 2010
DISMISSED
On May 11, 2010, we notified Appellant that the trial court’s certification in this appeal
states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”
Additionally, the clerk’s record contained a written waiver signed by the appellant pursuant to
which he entered a plea of no contest. The trial court’s judgment also reflected that there was a
plea bargain agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment
recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s 04-10-00102-CR
certification accurately reflected that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP.
P. 25.2(a)(2).
Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be
dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part
of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). We, therefore, ordered that this appeal
would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless
appellant caused an amended trial court certification to be filed by May 24, 2010, showing
appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154
S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio
2003, no pet.). No response has been received by this court. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal
in accordance with Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.
DO NOT PUBLISH
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abraham Alfonso Camacho v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-alfonso-camacho-v-state-texapp-2010.