Abraham Alfonso Camacho v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJuly 7, 2010
Docket04-10-00102-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Abraham Alfonso Camacho v. State (Abraham Alfonso Camacho v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abraham Alfonso Camacho v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-10-00102-CR

Abraham Alfonso CAMACHO, Appellant

v.

The STATE of Texas, Appellee

From the 144th Judicial District Court, Bexar County, Texas Trial Court No. 2009-CR-8752W Honorable Fred Shannon, Judge Presiding

PER CURIAM

Sitting: Rebecca Simmons, Justice Steven C. Hilbig, Justice Marialyn Barnard, Justice

Delivered and Filed: July 7, 2010

DISMISSED

On May 11, 2010, we notified Appellant that the trial court’s certification in this appeal

states that “this criminal case is a plea-bargain case, and the defendant has NO right of appeal.”

Additionally, the clerk’s record contained a written waiver signed by the appellant pursuant to

which he entered a plea of no contest. The trial court’s judgment also reflected that there was a

plea bargain agreement, and the punishment assessed did not exceed the punishment

recommended by the prosecutor and agreed to by the defendant; therefore, the trial court’s 04-10-00102-CR

certification accurately reflected that the criminal case is a plea-bargain case. See TEX. R. APP.

P. 25.2(a)(2).

Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure provides, “The appeal must be

dismissed if a certification that shows the defendant has a right of appeal has not been made part

of the record under these rules.” TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d). We, therefore, ordered that this appeal

would be dismissed pursuant to rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure unless

appellant caused an amended trial court certification to be filed by May 24, 2010, showing

appellant has the right of appeal. See TEX. R. APP. P. 25.2(d); 37.1; see also Dears v. State, 154

S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005); Daniels v. State, 110 S.W.3d 174 (Tex. App.—San Antonio

2003, no pet.). No response has been received by this court. We, therefore, dismiss this appeal

in accordance with Rule 25.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure.

DO NOT PUBLISH

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dears v. State
154 S.W.3d 610 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2005)
Daniels v. State
110 S.W.3d 174 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Abraham Alfonso Camacho v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abraham-alfonso-camacho-v-state-texapp-2010.