Abordo v. State
This text of Abordo v. State (Abordo v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-30254 08-JUL-2011 01:01 PM SCWC-30254
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
EDMUND M. ABORDO, Petitioner/Petitioner-Appellant,
vs.
STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Respondent-Appellee.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (S.P.P. NO. 09-1-0026; S.P. NO. 09-1-0426; CR. NO. 93-0737)
AMENDED ORDER DISMISSING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI WITHOUT PREJUDICE (By: McKenna, J., for the court1)
It appearing that the judgment on appeal in the above-
referenced matter has not been entered by the Intermediate Court
of Appeals, see Hawai#i Revised Statutes § 602-59(a) (Supp.
2008); see also Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure (HRAP) Rule
36(b)(1) (2008),
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner/Petitioner-
Appellant’s application for writ of certiorari, filed on July 5,
2011,2 is dismissed without prejudice to re-filing the
1 Court: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, Duffy, and McKenna, JJ., and Circuit Judge Ahn, in place of Acoba, J., recused.
2 In the July 7, 2011 Order Dismissing Application for Writ of Certiorari Without Prejudice the incorrect date of June 14, 2010 was listed. application pursuant to HRAP Rule 40.1(a) (“No later than 90 days
after the filing of the intermediate court of appeals’ judgment
on appeal or dismissal order, any party may apply in writing to
the supreme court for a writ of certiorari.”).
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, July 8, 2011.
FOR THE COURT:
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
Associate Justice
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abordo v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abordo-v-state-haw-2011.