Abney v. Whitted

28 La. Ann. 818
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJuly 15, 1876
DocketNo. 621
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 28 La. Ann. 818 (Abney v. Whitted) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abney v. Whitted, 28 La. Ann. 818 (La. 1876).

Opinions

Howell, J.

A motion is made to dismiss this appeal because, the defendant, having on the trial confessed the greater portion of the debt sued for, leaving a balance in dispute of less than five hundred dollars, this court is without jurisdiction.

The claim of plaintiffs is for a sum exceeding five hundred dollars, and the fact that in the answer and as a witness defendant admitted being indebted for a sum less than that sum did not change the demand of plaintiffs. Had the amounts admitted been certain and plaintiffs taken a judgment therefor, and thus left a small amount only in contest, the jurisdiction would have been affected. It is the demand of plaintiffs that gives jurisdiction.

Motion refused.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Commercial Credit Corp. v. Navarre
127 So. 2d 753 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1961)
Groner v. Capitol Syrup Co.
10 So. 2d 269 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1942)
Douglas Public Service Corporation v. Leon
200 So. 21 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1941)
Moreno v. Martínez
14 P.R. 371 (Supreme Court of Puerto Rico, 1908)
Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Johnston
42 So. 357 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1906)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
28 La. Ann. 818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abney-v-whitted-la-1876.