Abney v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Abney v. State

1968 OK CR 62, 439 P.2d 964, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 303

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 3, 1968

DocketNo. A-14512

StatusPublished

This text of 1968 OK CR 62 (Abney v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Abney v. State, 1968 OK CR 62, 439 P.2d 964, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 303 (Okla. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge:

This is an Original Proceeding in which the petitioner makes application to this Court for Post-Conviction Appeal. From the petition, it appears that the petitioner entered a plea of guilty to two charges of Obtaining Money by Means of a Bogus Check, and received two sentences of Four Years to run concurrently. Petitioner states that he was represented by counsel at the time he entered his plea of guilty. He states no actual basis for this Court to grant a Post-Conviction Appeal, but only complains that the sentence was excessive, and requests this Court to modify same.

Since the petitioner fails to substantiate sufficient grounds for Post-Conviction Appeal, the relief prayed for is hereby denied.

Writ denied.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

NIX, Presiding Judge:

This is an Original Proceeding in which the petitioner makes application to this Court for Post-Conviction Appeal. From the petition, it appears that the petitioner entered a plea of guilty to two charges of Obtaining Money by Means of a Bogus Check, and received two sentences of Four Years to run concurrently. Petitioner states that he was represented by counsel at the time he entered his plea of guilty. He states no actual basis for this Court to grant a Post-Conviction Appeal, but only complains that the sentence was excessive, and requests this Court to modify same.

Since the petitioner fails to substantiate sufficient grounds for Post-Conviction Appeal, the relief prayed for is hereby denied.

Writ denied.

BUSSEY and BRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1968 OK CR 62, 439 P.2d 964, 1968 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abney-v-state-oklacrimapp-1968.