Abney v. State

755 S.W.2d 369, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 839, 1988 WL 59568
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 14, 1988·No. No. 54102·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Movant appeals after the denial of his rule 27.26 motion without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. No error of law appears, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Abney v. State, 755 S.W.2d 369, 1988 Mo. App. LEXIS 839, 1988 WL 59568 (Mo. Ct. App. 1988).

755 S.W.2d 369 (Abney v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.