Abney v. Cole

10 S.E. 390, 30 S.C. 607
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedDecember 1, 1888
DocketNo. 2345
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 S.E. 390 (Abney v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abney v. Cole, 10 S.E. 390, 30 S.C. 607 (S.C. 1888).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

[607]*607This wras a motion to reinstate an appeal dismissed by the clerk under rule 1, upon the ground that the failure to file the return within forty days from the completion of the record was made through honest mistake, inadvertence, and misconstruction of the rule of court, and not with any intention whatsoever to delay the appeal.

The Supreme Court decides as follows: “It appearing in this case that the notice of appeal had not been given in writing, [608]*608which is absolutely required .under section 339 of the Code, this is fatal and prevents us from considering the alleged grounds of relief for failure to-file the return as required by the rule of this court. Inasmuch as section 349 of the Code allows the Supreme Court to grant relief in such cases only where the notice of appeal is given, as now required by law', to wit, in writing (Code, § 339), this petition is therefore dismissed.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wade v. Gore
151 S.E. 470 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
10 S.E. 390, 30 S.C. 607, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abney-v-cole-sc-1888.