Abner M. Contreras v. David Fernandez
This text of Abner M. Contreras v. David Fernandez (Abner M. Contreras v. David Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida
Opinion filed October 2, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
________________
No. 3D24-0894 Lower Tribunal No. 23-10266-CC-05 ________________
Abner M. Contreras, Appellant,
vs.
David Fernandez, Appellee.
An Appeal from the County Court for Miami-Dade County, Diana Gonzalez-Whyte, Judge.
Abner M. Contreras, in proper person.
Law Offices of Robert P. Frankel, P.A., and Robert P. Frankel (Plantation), for appellee.
Before LINDSEY, MILLER, and GORDO, JJ.
PER CURIAM. Before us on appeal is an order dismissing Appellant Abner M.
Contreras’s second amended complaint. The order merely states that the
corrected motion to dismiss the second amended complaint “is granted.” It
neither contains words of finality nor enters a dismissal in Appellee David
Fernandez’s favor. Because this is not a final order capable of review, we
lack jurisdiction to do so. Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal. See Henrion
v. New Era Realty IV, Inc., 567 So. 2d 562, 563 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (“Once
again we caution trial judges and attorneys alike that this court lacks
jurisdiction over an order granting a motion to dismiss a complaint, when that
order does not contain the requisite words of finality indicating that the cause
is dismissed.”).
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Abner M. Contreras v. David Fernandez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abner-m-contreras-v-david-fernandez-fladistctapp-2024.