Abner, Eugene Shannon

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 25, 2011
DocketWR-47,341-09
StatusPublished

This text of Abner, Eugene Shannon (Abner, Eugene Shannon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Abner, Eugene Shannon, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NO. WR-47,341-09
EX PARTE EUGENE SHANNON ABNER, Applicant


ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NO. 610227 IN THE 180TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT

FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to aggravated sexual assault of a child in exchange for deferred adjudication community supervision. He was later adjudicated guilty and sentenced to thirty years' imprisonment.

In his present application, Applicant raises three grounds for challenging his conviction. This application, however, presents a more serious question. This Court's records reflect that Applicant has filed six prior applications challenging this conviction. It is obvious from the record that Applicant continues to raise issues that have been presented and rejected in previous applications or that should have been presented in previous applications. The writ of habeas corpus is not to be lightly or easily abused. Sanders v. U.S., 373 U.S. 1 (1963); Ex parte Carr, 511 S.W.2d 523 (Tex. Crim. App. 1974). Because of his repetitive claims, we hold that Applicant's claims are barred from review under Article 11.07, § 4, and are waived and abandoned by his abuse of the writ. This application is dismissed.

Therefore, we instruct the Honorable Louise Pearson, Clerk of the Court of Criminal Appeals, not to accept or file the instant application for a writ of habeas corpus, or any future application attacking this conviction unless Applicant is able to show in such an application that any claims presented have not been raised previously and that they could not have been presented in a previous application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte Bilton, 602 S.W.2d 534 (Tex. Crim. App. 1980).

A copy of this order shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division.



Filed: May 25, 2011

Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sanders v. United States
373 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Ex Parte Bilton
602 S.W.2d 534 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1980)
Ex Parte Carr
511 S.W.2d 523 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1974)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Abner, Eugene Shannon, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/abner-eugene-shannon-texcrimapp-2011.