Ablowich v. Stursberg

Second Circuit

Ablowich v. Stursberg

105 F. 751, 45 C.C.A. 31, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3900

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 22, 1901

DocketNo. 48

StatusPublished

This text of 105 F. 751 (Ablowich v. Stursberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ablowich v. Stursberg, 105 F. 751, 45 C.C.A. 31, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3900 (2d Cir. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIÁM.

The evidence in the record satisfactorily denotes that the bankrupts had their books of account in their possession or under their control at the time of the preparation of the schedules annexed to their petition of bankruptcy, and that they have concealed or destroyed them for the purpose of thwarting an investigation into their financial' condition. The order denying their, petition for a discharge was consequently justified. Order affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIÁM.

The evidence in the record satisfactorily denotes that the bankrupts had their books of account in their possession or under their control at the time of the preparation of the schedules annexed to their petition of bankruptcy, and that they have concealed or destroyed them for the purpose of thwarting an investigation into their financial' condition. The order denying their, petition for a discharge was consequently justified. Order affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

105 F. 751, 45 C.C.A. 31, 1901 U.S. App. LEXIS 3900, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ablowich-v-stursberg-ca2-1901.