Ables v. Pearle

Texas Supreme Court

Ables v. Pearle

10 Tex. 285

CourtTexas Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 1, 1853

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 Tex. 285 (Ables v. Pearle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ables v. Pearle, 10 Tex. 285 (Tex. 1853).

Pincite

Opinion

LIPSCOMB, J.

Tiie only error assigned that it is necessary to notice is, that the court erred in dismissing the certiorari after a Term had intervened, on the authority of Dunn v. O’Brien, (5 Tex. R., 570,) and Steinlein v. Dial, decided at the present Term. The motion to dismiss or quash the writ of certiorari could not bo made after the return Term. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court.

Beversed and remanded.

Note. 55. — Steinlein v. Dial, ante 268.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LIPSCOMB, J.

Tiie only error assigned that it is necessary to notice is, that the court erred in dismissing the certiorari after a Term had intervened, on the authority of Dunn v. O’Brien, (5 Tex. R., 570,) and Steinlein v. Dial, decided at the present Term. The motion to dismiss or quash the writ of certiorari could not bo made after the return Term. The judgment is reversed and the cause remanded to the District Court.

Beversed and remanded.

Note. 55. — Steinlein v. Dial, ante 268.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Tex. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ables-v-pearle-tex-1853.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack