Able v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Able v. State

164 S.E. 168, 45 Ga. App. 225, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 248

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 30, 1932

Docket22131

StatusPublished

This text of 164 S.E. 168 (Able v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Able v. State, 164 S.E. 168, 45 Ga. App. 225, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 248 (Ga. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Since the record in this case is practically identical with that in Ham v. State, ante, 213, we hold that the evidence supports the verdict, and that the only special ground, based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, is not meritorious.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Jenkins, P. J., concur. C. A. Byars, M. G. Hides, Leward Hightower, I). T. Pye, for plaintiff in error. E. M. Owen, solicitor-general, John 8. McClelland, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Since the record in this case is practically identical with that in Ham v. State, ante, 213, we hold that the evidence supports the verdict, and that the only special ground, based upon alleged newly discovered evidence, is not meritorious.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, O. J., and Jenkins, P. J., concur. C. A. Byars, M. G. Hides, Leward Hightower, I). T. Pye, for plaintiff in error. E. M. Owen, solicitor-general, John 8. McClelland, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

164 S.E. 168, 45 Ga. App. 225, 1932 Ga. App. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/able-v-state-gactapp-1932.